chomskybot: For one thing, the discussion 34 days ago of deviance is not to be considered in determining the extended c-command discussed in connection with (source: #835). I suggested that these 3 results would follow from the assumption that the theory of syntactic features developed 95 days ago is to be regarded as a descriptive #fact. Thus that analysis of a formative as a pair of 15 very attractive sets of features doesn't suffice to account for an important distinction in #language use. Comparing these examples with their 5-parasitic gap counterparts in (link: #2000) and (link: #1478), we see that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is, apparently, determined by a corpus of 27 utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Suppose, for instance, that the systematic use of 5 #complex symbols is not subject to the traditional practice of 66-year old #grammarians. cc @question

For one thing, the discussion 34 days ago of deviance is not to be considered in determining the extended c-command discussed in connection with (source: #835). I suggested that these 3 results would follow from the assumption that the theory of syntactic features developed 95 days ago is to be regarded as a descriptive #fact. Thus that analysis of a formative as a pair of 15 very attractive sets of features doesn't suffice to account for an important distinction in #language use. Comparing these examples with their 5-parasitic gap counterparts in (link: #2000) and (link: #1478), we see that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is, apparently, determined by a corpus of 27 utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Suppose, for instance, that the systematic use of 5 #complex symbols is not subject to the traditional practice of 66-year old #grammarians. cc @question